Quantcast
Channel: Bangalore – EPHESIANS-511.NET- A Roman Catholic Ministry Exposing Errors in the Indian Church
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18

Dominic Dixon- Motion Record on behalf of Applicant in writing to be dealt with in the Edmonton local office for an Order for confidentiality relief to remove a past record of deportation having occurred in the year 1998 from the Federal website; filed on 15-MAY-2017

$
0
0

JUNE 13, 2017

 

Dominic Dixon- Motion Record on behalf of Applicant in writing to be dealt with in the Edmonton local office for an Order for confidentiality relief to remove a past record of deportation having occurred in the year 1998 from the Federal website; filed on 15-MAY-2017

 

Our earlier files on or related to Dominic Dixon in chronological order:

1. MORELOVE-HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE-SOUL TIES AND ETHOS INSTITUTE 31 JANUARY/ 12/15/17/18/22/23 MARCH, 6/8/16/26/29 APRIL/JULY/DECEMBER 2013/UPDATED 18 NOVEMBER 2015

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/MORELOVE-HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE-SOUL_TIES_AND_ETHOS_INSTITUTE.doc

2. HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE
ANEEL ARANHA AND NEW AGE
9 MAY 2013

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE_ANEEL_ARANHA_AND_NEW_AGE.doc

3. HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE-WARNING ALERT ISSUED BY CATHOLICCULTURE.ORG
19 MAY/5 JUNE 2013

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/HOLYSPIRITINTERACTIVE-WARNING_ALERT_ISSUED_BY_CATHOLICCULTURE.ORG.doc

4. THE PRAKASH LASRADOS, THE JOHNSON SEQUEIRAS AND THE DOMINIC DIXONS
28 JULY 2013

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/THE_PRAKASH_LASRADOS_THE_JOHNSON_SEQUEIRAS_AND_THE_DOMINIC_DIXONS.doc

5. DOMINIC DIXON AND MORELOVE-MORE UNHOLINESS 4 AUGUST 2013

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/DOMINIC_DIXON_AND_MORELOVE-MORE_UNHOLINESS.doc

6. DOMINIC DIXON CONTINUES TO DECEIVE CATHOLICS 24 OCTOBER 2014

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/DOMINIC_DIXON_CONTINUES_TO_DECEIVE_CATHOLICS.doc

7. FLAME MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL YOGA AND ANEEL ARANHA
29 JANUARY 2016

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/FLAME_MINISTRIES_INTERNATIONAL_YOGA_AND_ANEEL_ARANHA.doc

8. BANGALORE DELIVERANCE MINISTRY CHRISTOPHER CORREYAS NOTORIOUS ASSOCIATE DANNY DANZ 31 OCTOBER 2016

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/BANGALORE_DELIVERANCE_MINISTRY_CHRISTOPHER_CORREYAS_NOTORIOUS_ASSOCIATE_DANNY_DANZ.doc

9. DOMINIC DIXON CONVICTED IN USA DEPORTED FROM CANADA FOR SEXUAL MOLESTATION OF BOY 15/22 FEBRUARY 2017

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/DOMINIC_DIXON_CONVICTED_IN_USA_DEPORTED_FROM_CANADA_FOR_SEXUAL_MOLESTATION_OF_BOY.doc

10. UNITED NATIONS AGENCY DISTANCES ITSELF FROM DOMINIC DIXON
12/13 JUNE 2017

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/UNITED_NATIONS_AGENCY_DISTANCES_ITSELF_FROM_DOMINIC_DIXON.doc

 

In the ninth file, we produced evidence of one of Dominic Dixon’s sexual molestations of a minor which we had known about for at least three years but could not report till now without documentation.

The violated family is a third cousin of Dominic Dixon and her husband Bruce P. (name withheld) and the assault occurred in Des Moines, Iowa, USA in February 1995.

He was charged, tried, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the USA and deported from Canada where he was living with his parents.

 

The current file is an update of file number 9. Dixon has evidently made the following referred rejected appeal to the Canadian government on his receipt of our report no. 9 by email from us.

 

 

 

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=IMM-916-98&select_court=T

PROCEEDINGS QUERIES

Recorded entry(ies) for IMM-916-98

Court number information

Court Number : 

IMM-916-98 

Style of Cause : 

DOMINIC FABIAN DIXON
v. MCI

Proceeding Category : 

Immigration Leave & Judicial Review 

Nature : 

Imm – Appl. for leave & jud. review – IRB -Immigration Appeal Division 

Type of Action : 

Non-Action 

 

39 records found for court number IMM-916-98

Doc 

Date Filed 

Office 

Recorded Entry Summary

 

2017-05-31 

Edmonton 

Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Applicant with respect to Order Doc No. 20 (dated 29-MAY-2017) placed on file on 31-MAY-2017 

 

2017-05-29 

Edmonton 

Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Respondent with respect to Order Doc No. 20 (dated 29-MAY-2017) placed on file on 29-MAY-2017

20 

2017-05-29 

Edmonton 

Order dated 29-MAY-2017 rendered by Roger Lafrenière, Esq., Prothonotary Matter considered without personal appearance The Court’s decision is with regard to Motion in writing Doc. No. 10 Result: dismissed Filed on 29-MAY-2017 copies sent to parties entered in J. & O. Book, volume 749 page(s) 445 – 447 Interlocutory Decision

 

2017-05-29 

Edmonton 

Communication to the Court from the Registry dated 29-MAY-2017 re: Motion Doc No. 10

19 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Reply to Doc No. 15 on behalf of the applicant filed on 24-MAY-2017 

 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Applicant with respect to Direction of the Court dated 24-MAY-2017 placed on file on 24-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Confirmation of successful fax transmission received from Respondent with respect to Direction of the Court dated 24-MAY-2017 placed on file on 24-MAY-2017 

 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Written directions of the Court: Roger Lafrenière, Esq., Prothonotary dated 24-MAY-2017 directing “The Applicant’s written representations in reply and reply affidavit shall be accepted for filing.” received on 24-MAY-2017

18 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Consent to electronic service of all documents that are not required to be served personally on behalf of the respondent at the following address for service: galina.bining@justice.gc.ca; filed on 24-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Letter from counsel for the Respondent to the Applicant dated 24-MAY-2017 accepting service of the Applicant’s reply submissions by email and contesting the Affidavit that was included with the reply submissions. Letter sent by fax to the Edmonton Registry, received on 24-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-24 

Edmonton 

Communication to the Court from the Registry dated 24-MAY-2017 re: Applicant’s Reply doc for filing

17 

2017-05-19 

Edmonton 

Solicitor’s certificate of service on behalf of Galina Bining confirming service of Doc No. 16 upon Applicant by email (with consent) on 19-MAY-2017 filed on 19-MAY-2017

16 

2017-05-19 

Edmonton 

Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 10 containing the following original document(s): 15 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf of Respondent filed on 19-MAY-2017 

15 

2017-05-19 

Edmonton 

Written representations contained within a Motion Record on behalf of the respondent in opposition to Motion Doc No. 10 filed on 19-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Successful communication result report received from fax sent to the Department of Justice with respect to Directions of the Court dated 15-MAY-2017 and service of Doc. 13 and Doc. 14 placed on file on 15-MAY-2017

14 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Motion Record containing the following original document(s): 10 11 12 Number of copies received: 1 on behalf of Applicant filed on 15-MAY-2017 Certified copy(ies)/copy(ies) transmitted to Director of the Regional Office of the Department of Justice

13 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Consent to electronic service of all documents in this proceeding that are not required to be served personally; on behalf of the applicant address for service: dom@dominicdixon.net; filed on 15-MAY-2017

12 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Written representations contained within a Motion Record on behalf of the applicant in support of Motion Doc. 10 filed on 15-MAY-2017 

11 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Affidavit of Dr. Dominic Fabian Dixon contained within a Motion Record on behalf of the applicant sworn on 13-MAY-2017 in support of Motion Doc. 10 with attached exhibit(s) A, B, C, filed on 15-MAY-2017 

10 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Notice of Motion contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Applicant in writing to be dealt with in the Edmonton local office for an Order for confidentiality relief to remove a past record of deportation having occurred in the year 1998 from the Federal website; filed on 15-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Written directions received from the Court: Roger Lafrenière, Esq., Prothonotary dated 15-MAY-2017 directing that “The Applicant’s motion record and consent to electronic service shall be accepted for filing. Proof of service of the “Notice of Consent to e-service” shall be rejected for filing as the document was not served at the address reflected in the Respondent’s Notice of Appearance filed on March 5, 1998. The Registry is directed to forthwith serve the Applicant’s motion record and consent to electronic service on the local office of the Department of Justice Canada, along with a copy of these directions. The Respondent shall serve and file a responding motion record no later than May 29, 2017.” Directions sent by email to the Applicant and by facsimile to the Edmonton Office of the Department of Justice at (780)495-8491. Copy of Directions placed on file on 15-MAY-2017

 

2017-05-15 

Edmonton 

Communication to the Court from the Registry dated 15-MAY-2017 re: Documents received in e-filing on Saturday May 13, 2017 sent for directions pursuant to rule 72.

 

2017-03-22 

Edmonton 

Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Applicant with respect to Directions of the Court sent by email on 22-MAR-2017, placed on file on 22-MAR-2017

 

2017-03-22 

Edmonton 

Written directions received from the Court: Roger Lafrenière, Esq., Prothonotary dated 22-MAR-2017 directing that “The letter from the Applicant dated March 20, 2017 tendered by e-filing as a notice of motion shall be rejected for filing pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Courts Rules. The Applicant’s request to remove data from the Federal Court website shall not be entertained informally by the Court. The Applicant may, if so advised, bring a motion for relief pursuant to Rule 369.” placed on file on 22-MAR-2017

 

2017-03-21 

Edmonton 

Communication to the Court from the Registry dated 21-MAR-2017 re: Letter from the Applicant received via e-filing sent for directions 

 

1998-06-09 

Ottawa 

(Final decision) Order rendered by The Honourable Madam Justice McGillis at Ottawa on 08-JUN-1998 dismissing the application for leave with a request for an extension of time (R.6) Decision endorsed on the record on Application for Leave and for Judicial Review doc. #1 received on 09-JUN-1998 Considered by the Court without personal appearance entered in J. & O. Book, volume 116 page(s) 4 – 4 Certificate of the order sent to all parties Transmittal Letters placed on file.

9 

1998-04-27 

Ottawa 

Certified French translation of the reasons for order / doc. # 8 delivered 16-APR-1998 filed on 27-APR-1998

8 

1998-03-09 

Ottawa 

Reasons for order by The Honourable Mr. Justice Richard delivered 09-MAR-1998 at Ottawa filed on 09-MAR-1998 Copies of reasons sent to all parties  

7 

1998-03-09 

Ottawa

Order rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice Richard at Ottawa on 09-MAR-1998 dismissing the stay of execution of a deportation order Decision filed on 09-MAR-1998 Considered by the Court with personal appearance entered in J. & O. Book, volume 110 page(s) 136 – 136 Certified copy of the order sent to all parties

 

1998-03-09 

Ottawa 

Ottawa 09-MAR-1998 BEFORE The Honourable Mr. Justice Richard Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 5 on behalf of Applicant motion for stay of execution of deportation order Result of Hearing: Matter dismissed held by way of Conference Call in chambers Duration per day: 09-MAR-1998 from 12:00 to 12:55 Courtroom : Judge’s Chambers – Ottawa Court Registrar: Robert Lemoine 09-MAR-1998 from 12:00 to 12:55 Courtroom : Examination for Discovery Room – Edmonton Court Registrar: Kathy Dobransky Total Duration: 55min Appearances: Mr. Dominic Fabian Dixon (403)483-7637 representing Applicant on his own behalf Mr. Brad Hardstaff (403)495-5895 representing Respondent Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 62 page(s) 144 – 151 Abstract of Hearing placed on file

6 

1998-03-09 

Edmonton 

Affidavit of Kathleen E. Galloway sworn on 09-MAR-1998 on behalf of Respondent in opposition to Motion Doc. No. 5 with Exhibits A,B filed on 09-MAR-1998

5 

1998-03-09 

Edmonton 

Notice of Motion on behalf of Applicant returnable at Special Sitting in Ottawa on 09-MAR-1998 to begin at 12:00 for an Order for a stay of deportation order filed on 09-MAR-1998 

 

1998-03-06 

Ottawa 

Oral directions of the Court received from The Honourable Mr. Justice Hugessen dated 06-MAR-1998 directing that the motion for a stay may be heard before this Court, by teleconference, from the City of Ottawa, Ontario, on Monday, the 9th day of March, 1998 at 12:00 noon (Ott. time), 10:00 o’clock in the forenoon (Edmonton time). R. Lemoine has been advised of the above. placed on file on 06-MAR-1998

4 

1998-03-05 

Edmonton 

Affidavit of Dominic Fabian Dixon on behalf of the applicant sworn on 05-MAR-1998 confirming service of Doc 1 and stay materials received 3-MAR-1998 on the respondent by personal service on 03-MAR-1998 confirming service the Affidavit of Dominic Fabian Dixon, sworn 5-MAR-1998 on the respondent by personal service on 05-MAR-1998 filed on 05-MAR-1998

 

1998-03-05 

Edmonton 

Affidavit of Dominic Fabian Dixon on behalf of the applicant sworn on 05-MAR-1998 in support of the applicant’s request for a stay of removal received on 05-MAR-1998 

3 

1998-03-05 

Edmonton 

Affidavit of Mary Lou Howarth on behalf of the respondent sworn on 04-MAR-1998 confirming service of Notice of Appearance on the applicant by courier on 04-MAR-1998 confirming service Notice of Appearance on the IRB by registered mail on 04-MAR-1998 filed on 05-MAR-1998

2 

1998-03-05 

Edmonton 

Notice of appearance on behalf of the respondent filed on 05-MAR-1998

 

1998-03-03 

Edmonton 

Letter from the applicant dated 03-MAR-1998 re: requesting an urgent stay of removal teleconference to be convened received on 03-MAR-1998 

1 

1998-03-03 

Edmonton 

Application for leave and judicial review and for an extension of time pursuant to s. 82.1(1) of the Immigration Act against a decision IRB-IAD 19-MAR-1997 V97-00921 filed on 03-MAR-1998 Written reasons received by the Applicant Tariff fee of $50.00 received

 

The last database update occurred on 2017-06-15 19:22

 

Why did we commence writing about Dominic Dixon?

Why do we continue to do so?

Our ministry exposes Catholics in authority and with influence over others such as priests, bishops, institutions and persons in lay ministry who lead the faithful astray.

Our ministry is absolutely impersonal and objective. It is not focused exclusively on Dominic Dixon or on any other individual. It is a ministry of Catholic apologetics meant to warn Catholics against potential spiritual dangers.

Dixon just happens to be one of those many Catholics in lay ministry whom we have exposed. And, very importantly, he has the open support of preachers like Colin Calmiano, priests like Fr. Dominic Emmanuel SVD, Catholic Charismatic Renewal leaders like Simon Rodrigues, and bishops like Archbishop Bernard Moras
of Bangalore and the Vicariate of Arabia (the latter courtesy of Aneel Aranha of HolySpiritInteractive, Dubai). He is thus encouraged and enabled to reach out and access Catholics in institutions, parishes and prayer groups, and to represent the Church in the secular media in India and beyond.

It also helped him to con an organisation like UNITAR/CIFAL and their associates at ACTS into opening the door (which has now been closed) to him.

Incidentally, his favored interests and activities happen to be in the areas of pornography, sexual morality (of youth in colleges)… and corruption!!!

 

Why do we believe that Dixon leads Catholics astray?

The information compiled in our reports exposes his complete lack of credibility, misrepresentations, blatant lies, false claims, exaggerations, misuse of his connections with people in authority, his downright criminal activities like anonymous threatening calls and phone tapping, his being a convicted pedophile and much, much more.

He is absolutely unqualified to author books on psychology and to “minister” to Catholics.

He therefore has no business to teach/interpret the Bible, to give courses on Pope John Paul II’s Theology of the Body and to conduct campaigns and courses in Catholic institutions, and to be allowed anywhere near children and youth.

Those who continue to back this impostor and sexual pervert will have to shoulder the blame along with him when the law in this country finally catches up with “Dr.” Dominic Dixon and comes to know about who and what Dixon really is.

 

Dixon’s latest reaction — the “legal charges” and “defamation case” against us and our associates — if pursued by him will only hasten his arrest and land him in jail on various counts.

His own relatives want to see him behind bars and have contacted us with the necessary documentation to that end.

The Archbishop of Bangalore (who is referred to by Dixon on page 8 of his “legal notice”*) and lay Catholic leaders in India and Dubai who prop up Dixon and his schemes will have to continue to bear with our naming them in our reports.

*Dixon requires us to apologize in writing to the Archbishop and the Chairman of the Bangalore Charismatic Renewal, and to compensate him financially for having tarnished his name!!!

 

One does not have to wonder why, when filing “legal charges” of defamation against us, Dixon does not mention the very serious claim that his relatives and this ministry have documented about his being a pedophile, convict and deportee. And the other question about the authenticity of his various university degrees and educational qualifications. That, too, is something that the Indian police and courts would be very interested in. And that may only be the tip of the iceberg.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18

Trending Articles